|
|
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Mark V Walker X-To: Mark Fisher X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \mark fischer 7-12-02\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: FISCHER-M X-FileName: mark fischer 7-12-02 LNotes.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron on 06/11/2002 09:47 AM --------------------------- Mark V Walker 05/29/2002 03:51 PM To: Joe Thorpe/EWC/Enron@Enron cc: John Nemila/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Preliminary results from analysis of Visupro data for 5/17/02 time period that Gary Verkleeren asked about I just noticed that I referred to month 5 in some of the dates in memo0529AEP. My apologies. Below is a corrected version that replaces the previous memo0529AEP. Mark V Walker 05/29/2002 03:42 PM To: Joe Thorpe/EWC/Enron@Enron cc: John Nemila/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron Subject: Preliminary results from analysis of Visupro data for 5/17/02 time period that Gary Verkleeren asked about Joe, See the file Memo0529AEP. Is there a simple explanation for why the system OK counter continued to increment 44.7 hrs when the turbine blades were pitched out to 80 degrees? The turbine was not powered down, put in maintenance, put in repair, or faulted off. I talked to the controller people and the attached memo are the only commands other than manual pause that will cause this. They sent me the file I stored as PausingCauses. Call me at 6753 if you need any further info. Please call me with your thoughts on this & I will finish a writeup for Gary Verkleeren. Our group is working on an improved capability to detect periods of long pausing. However, until the data recovery of Statdat files improves this new capability may not be consistently reliable or timely.
|