Enron Mail

From:s-news-owner@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
To:dmck@u.washington.edu
Subject:Re: [S] confidence intervals for Weibull shape parameter
Cc:s-news@wubios.wustl.edu
Bcc:s-news@wubios.wustl.edu
Date:Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:51:00 -0700 (PDT)

"D. Mckenzie" <dmck@u.washington.edu< writes:

< Splus 2000 r3.
<
< I have fit a 2-parameter Weibull distribution to a data vector (fire-free
< intervals in forests) and would like to compute the probability that the
< shape parameter is greater than 1. I can use bootstrap() [I presume] to
< compute the standard error. Is there a closed expression for CIs? (I
< imagine a normal approximation would be pretty lame here).
<
< Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

Profile likelihood would work well here. Because the conditional mle
for the scale parameter, given the shape parameter, has a closed-form
expression you can evaluate the profile log-likelihood for the shape
parameter explicitly.

I used this as an example in a presentation at the recent Joint
Statistical Meetings on "Using Open Source Software to Teach
Mathematical Statistics". (As you might guess from the title, I was
primarily discussing another implementation of the S language but the
examples work - with minor modifications - in S-PLUS.) The PDF file for
the presentation is available as
http://www.stat.wisc.edu/~bates/JSM2001.pdf
Look especially at slide 26 where the profile log-likelihood function
for the shape parameter is defined as
< profilell <- function(alpha)
+ -sum(dweibull(xmp04.30$lifetime, shape = alpha,
+ scale = mean(xmp04.30$lifetimealpha)(1/alpha), log = TRUE))
< profilell(2.15) # negative profile log-likelihood at estimate
[1] 77.0951
< mle3 <- nlm(profilell, c(alpha = 1.0), hessian = TRUE)
< unlist(mle3[-3])
minimum estimate hessian code iterations
77.095088 2.152001 3.378437 1.000000 7.000000
(This is R, not S-PLUS. In S-PLUS I think you must evaluate dweibull
without log = TRUE then take the log of the result and you would use
ms rather than nlm.)

Using the approximate distribution of twice the change in the profile
log-likelihood as a chi-square with 1 df (at least I think that is the
correct formula), you can construct confidence limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu. To
unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@lists.biostat.wustl.edu with
the BODY of the message: unsubscribe s-news