|
|
Enron Mail |
Please skim through the attachment below to see if you have any concerns
about how the faults should trigger in the future. ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron on 04/16/2002 04:59 PM --------------------------- Erik Ellis 04/16/2002 04:13 PM To: mark.walker@enron.com cc: Subject: Re: downtime allocation document and parameter list ---------------------- Forwarded by Erik Ellis/EWC/Enron on 04/16/2002 04:27 PM --------------------------- Garth Ripton 04/16/2002 12:33 AM To: Erik Ellis/EWC/Enron@Enron cc: Kim Nguyen/EWC/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: downtime allocation document and parameter list Hi Erik, I worked on this for a little while last night but I couldn't get a modem connection from the Hotel. I hope the timing is OK. The confirmed counters are highlighted in green. The counters that need to be corrected are highlighted in red. Most of the corrections are due to the fact that the fault/status messages that are the result of enabling a "manual" operation mode (for example, manual yaw) increment the maintenance counter not the "turbine OK" counter. Unfortunately, there are many faults that we could not confirm using the turbine simulator. If you have any questions Kim Nguyen is the person who did the actual testing. I forwarded the results to Mark Fischer and Mark Walker so they could check to see if this is the way we want the counters incremented for the given fault conditions but have yet to get any feedback. The faults that we could not test should be confirmed by looking at the Bachmann software. Hopefully this will occur in the near future. For now, this is the best information we have. -Garth
|