Enron Mail

From:jeff.duff@enron.com
To:david.miller@enron.com, patricia.hunter@enron.com
Subject:DB Table Additions
Cc:hollis.kimbrough@enron.com, jeff.marecic@enron.com, mark.fisher@enron.com,mark.walker@enron.com
Bcc:hollis.kimbrough@enron.com, jeff.marecic@enron.com, mark.fisher@enron.com,mark.walker@enron.com
Date:Fri, 24 May 2002 01:27:00 -0700 (PDT)

To support the data storage of ZMET data here is a proposal for what the
table structure should be. In addition, after discussing the status messages
it is important to differentiate between those which effect availability and
those that do not. The FAULTS table includes a flag field INCLUDE which
serves this purpose for STAR.

A improvement to this table would be to add a counter description field
var(4) which would hold one of the following descriptions; SOT, LOT, DT, WOT,
MT, RT, and EST. This will allow us do differentiate status messages by
which counter they are associated with.

Since the intent is to mirror the SQL Server and the STAR db we need to make
these changes to both. I'd like to get the SQL server changes ASAP so I can
develop some additional reports.

Let me know what you think

JD