Enron Mail

From:garth.ripton@enron.com
To:mark.fisher@enron.com, mark.walker@enron.com
Subject:EW 1.5 Status counters
Cc:ronald.brzezinski@enron.com, joe.chapman@enron.com,alaadin.suliman@enron.com, kim.nguyen@enron.com
Bcc:ronald.brzezinski@enron.com, joe.chapman@enron.com,alaadin.suliman@enron.com, kim.nguyen@enron.com
Date:Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:12:00 -0800 (PST)

Hi Mark and Mark,

Over the past few weeks we have generated a list of which status counters are
incremented during which fault/status conditions. Kim Nguyen tested all the
fault/status conditions that she could using the EW1.5 software simulator
(about 50% of them). Her list also includes the "theoretical" counter that is
supposed to increment according to the specifications that we have received
from the Scada department in Rheine.



I took that list and indexed it by counter so it show all the faults that
actually (according to our simulation) increment a given counter. I also
included the faults that we could not test and the counters they
theoretically increment.



If you have time could you please check to see that the given faults are
incrementing the correct counters using the proper definitions of
availability. Specifically, there are several highlighted items in the second
document that may not be correct. We are trying to get a list back to the
Scada group in Rheine to correct any problems with our counters and you input
would be extremely valuable.

Thanks,

Garth