Here's a thought that didn't occur to me when I marked up the mock trial
script. Should we have the consultants prominantly feature "IPEC
Busters"??? Unless we are pretty sure the judge will keep it out on
relevance grounds, it might be useful to at least get some juror reactions to
it. With or without the specific IPEC Busters stuff, we probably ought to
assume that Jad's theme will be that Northern's whole philosophy was to
breach contracts without flinching if it served our commercial interests.
The vitriol from P&P and the other producers plays into that theme. Maybe we
ought to spice that part of the script up a bit also just so we can see how
our response plays. DF