|
|
Enron Mail |
sorry--left you out of the distrib. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/26/2000 05:27 PM --------------------------- From: Drew Fossum 06/26/2000 05:30 PM To: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, FKelly@gbmdc.com, SStojic@gbmdc.com Subject: PG&E I need you guys to jump back into your files on the Topock issue asap. Tony, I assume Lou briefed you on the situation. I think the most recent liquids sample had pcbs in excess of 50 ppm. That is well in excess of the contractual limit that I recall to be 1 ppm. Our research a few months ago was about options to force the interconnect back open above 250 mm/d if the samples came back clean. Now, the issue is, given dirty samples, what can we do to keep PGE from slamming the interconnect shut. We need to complete our research/thinking immediately and have a spectrum of options ready to discuss. Seriously, I am reviewing with Lou the option of a preemptive shut down of the interconnect, but that looks like an unwise strategy so far. ALL ideas are worth considering. Frank, Steve, and Maria, anything in your memory banks on TW or FERC jurisprudence that would prevent a Hinshaw from refusing to schedule transport volumes through a point even if the Hinshaw seemed to have clear contractual rights to refuse to schedule volumes based on gas quality/contamination concerns? I don't think TW's tariff has a specific PCB spec. DF
|