Enron Mail

From:drew.fossum@enron.com
To:emily.sellers@enron.com
Subject:Project EWE ll - possible joint bid
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 13 Mar 2000 23:23:00 -0800 (PST)

Emily, please print this up for me with attachment. I'll stop by later to
pick it up. Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/14/2000
07:22 AM ---------------------------



From: John Goodpasture 03/13/2000 03:45 PM


To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey
Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lou Potempa/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dwight
Larson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sarabeth
Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Ratner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Project EWE ll - possible joint bid

It it becomes desirable to structure the Reliant deal off balance sheet, we
would most likely need a partner, either an industry participant or a
financial entity. Some potential industry partners might include Nisource,
Utilicorp, or Oneok. (are there others?)

According to the press, Nisource will need to pay down debt following the
Columbia merger. However they have a continuing strategic appetite for LDC
assets. They are/will be a registered Utility Holding Company, so obviously
PUHCA poses no concern for them.

Here is a possible structure for an Enron/Nisource JV purchase of the Reliant
package. Other Nisource and /or Columbia assets could be added to the
transaction to generate net excess cash for Nisource (presumeably only if ENE
had a strategic interest in the added assets).

Comments please.

JNG