|
|
Enron Mail |
First, I thought the inservice was to be earlier than 3rd quarter?? confused
Second, on term I'd suggest we say a minimum of five years, so if someone wants to bid for a longer term they can-- Third, in the 3rd paragraph change the reference to term, to as specifed above- Fourth, in the last paragraph, add minimum term of five years again. MK Steven Harris 12/04/2000 08:07 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting Yes, I thought was to not take back space in the EOT area since we have some available and were not looking to expand there. Drew Fossum 12/04/2000 07:57 AM To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting Looks OK to me, subject to approval from MKM's group. Should we also solicit turnback in the East of Thoreau area in addition to soliciting it from Cal. border to Thoreau? Is it our theory that since Thor.-Cal is the constrained segment, thats the only area we need to solicit turnback on? DF Lindy Donoho 12/01/2000 02:22 PM To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Draft Open Season Posting Attached is a draft posting for the 10,000/d mainline expansion. Please let me know your comments by the end of the day Monday, December 4th. Thanks!
|