Enron Mail

From:steven.harris@enron.com
To:mary.miller@enron.com
Subject:Re: Draft Open Season Posting
Cc:drew.fossum@enron.com, lindy.donoho@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com,susan.scott@enron.com, keith.petersen@enron.com, glen.hass@enron.com, mary.darveaux@enron.com
Bcc:drew.fossum@enron.com, lindy.donoho@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com,susan.scott@enron.com, keith.petersen@enron.com, glen.hass@enron.com, mary.darveaux@enron.com
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 01:06:00 -0800 (PST)

I agree that we should saya minimum term of five years. The in-service date
will depend on exactly what mods need to be done which will not be defined
until Friday or Monday but we need canvass the market now since the timing is
right. The in-service could hopefully be even earlier.





From: Mary Kay Miller 12/04/2000 08:25 AM


To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

First, I thought the inservice was to be earlier than 3rd quarter?? confused
Second, on term I'd suggest we say a minimum of five years, so if someone
wants to bid for a longer term they can--
Third, in the 3rd paragraph change the reference to term, to as specifed
above-
Fourth, in the last paragraph, add minimum term of five years again.

MK



Steven Harris
12/04/2000 08:07 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Yes, I thought was to not take back space in the EOT area since we have some
available and were not looking to expand there.



Drew Fossum
12/04/2000 07:57 AM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Open Season Posting

Looks OK to me, subject to approval from MKM's group. Should we also solicit
turnback in the East of Thoreau area in addition to soliciting it from Cal.
border to Thoreau? Is it our theory that since Thor.-Cal is the constrained
segment, thats the only area we need to solicit turnback on? DF



Lindy Donoho
12/01/2000 02:22 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Draft Open Season Posting

Attached is a draft posting for the 10,000/d mainline expansion. Please let
me know your comments by the end of the day Monday, December 4th.

Thanks!