|
|
Enron Mail |
I haven't had a chance to study this yet, but I'd like you guys to take a
hard look at it and lets meet on Mon or Tues. I'll be in Houston ( I think). Martha pls set up a meeting with these guys and I'll talk to you about when I'm going down. df Mark Knippa@ECT 02/05/2001 05:28 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron Subject: Gallup Station - Demand Rebate Hey Drew, Sorry that we did not get to meet last week when you were in town. I have pulled up some information on the project performance and wanted to share with the group. I was very concerned by the comment that the project was on a rate to cost TW an additional $1.0 million for the year because the demand avoidance program was not in place. I do want to confirm that Arnold Eisenstein at ET&S working on the development of the programming to support TW's efforts to minimize demand expenses. It was my understanding during the development of this project, that TW was targeting a 75% avoidance for an annual basis. I offer the following details regarding the actual operation of the station in 2000. Peak load for 12,000 hp = 9,621 kw x 3 = 28,864.0 kw per Quarter Actual Utilization 3rd Quarter 2000 % of Max 4th Quarter 2000 % of Max kw - generation 22,684.8 78.6 17,779 61.6 kw - transmission 25,421.0 88.1 22,992 79.6 Target $'s @ 75% 99,142 75.0 73,480 75.0 Net Actual Rebate $'s 75,935 78.6 105,181 61.59 difference ($23,206) $31,702 Overall net for 2000 under Rate 21 appears to reflect that TW has saved $8,496 above their target rebate of $170,622 (75% avoidance) for the 3rd and 4th quarters. In addition, ECS has made payment to TW under Rate 19 that resulted in an additional $118,441 paid to TW. Note that ECS has proposed to included the transmission demand in the Rebate process which is not specifically addressed the Compression Service Agreement. Currently TW has access to the web site that graphically displays the current Tri-State generation load as well as several years of month by month history. This access was conveyed to TW as soon as the confidentiality agreement between TW, ECS and Tri-State was executed and delivered to ECS. At this point, EE&CC (now under ET&S) was notified that the system access was available to package the load monitoring programming. As I mentioned above, that effort is underway. I will be glad to meet and/or discuss these issues when you are available. I will be travelling most of the next (2) weeks but you can reach me via email or my cell phone (713) 851-7703. Based on the information that I was able to pull together, I just don't see the magnitude of dollars that seems to have TW concerned. I would like to discuss at your earliest convenience. Thanks, mk
|