|
|
Enron Mail |
Unless we have bought something that I'm not aware of, I don't believe TW or
NN has any assets or operations in Louisiana and therefore should not be subject to the referenced tax. As far as other jurisdictions, I don't expect that we'd have a problem with in-kind payment as an additional payment option. On TW, which has no fuel tracker, in kind tax payment probably wouldn't help us. Northern does have a fuel tracker, however, and might avoid adverse earnings impact from tax volatility if we could pay those taxes in kind and stick them in the tracker. We probably couldn't do that until the next rate case, however, because all current taxes are built into our base rates at some representative level. Rod Hayslett 04/10/2000 01:00 PM To: James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Jerry Thomas Moore/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Louisiana Compressor Fuel What do you all think of this one? ---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 04/10/2000 01:00 PM --------------------------- Jerry Thomas Moore 04/10/2000 11:43 AM To: Michael L Fredell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greek Rice/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Guthrie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Sandra Hrna/HOU/ECT@ect, Bill Moore/HOU/EES@EES, Gavin Russo/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Louisiana Compressor Fuel There is a proposal concerning paying the Louisiana Use (Sales) Tax by using in-kind rather than paying cash. Please see the attached memo below giving details and asking for your comments: -jtm
|