Enron Mail

From:drew.fossum@enron.com
To:steven.harris@enron.com
Subject:Re: Pueblo project
Cc:kevin.hyatt@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, james.centilli@enron.com,tim.aron@enron.com
Bcc:kevin.hyatt@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, james.centilli@enron.com,tim.aron@enron.com
Date:Tue, 7 Mar 2000 03:32:00 -0800 (PST)

Sounds reasonable to me. When do we sign? Seriously, this just confirms in
my mind that Langley isn't looking very closely at the economics of the deal
because he doesn't have any capital or O & M numbers (or heat rates) on the
generation equipment so he has no idea how thick or thin the margins might be
on this project. Once we are able to show him some economics he will
presumably be in a position to be reasonable on the issues discussed below.
If he's not willing to be reasonable, we're done talking to him.




Steven Harris
03/07/2000 10:28 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Pueblo project

I spoke to Dennis Langley yesterday about his ideas on the financial stake
he is looking for in the project. There are several items which will need to
be included in our economic analysis as they will burden the project . The
conditions are as follows:

- Dennis needs (wants) to recover the O&M for his idea-generating group which
he estimates to be $2 to $3 million per year!
- Share with Dennis a 50/50 split of any incremental revenue TW receives on
its existing line as a result of additional capacity sold to serve these
markets!
- A 50/50 split of any revenue received on the new line which is built .
- The Native American tribe(s) will receive 25% of ownership in the assets
and 25% of the cashflow stream after payout (he mentioned something about an
IRR of 8% being the threshold).

His general feeling was that the pipeline should be a 50/50 joint venture
but the gas-fired generation plant would be ours. James will need to run the
numbers but my uneducated guess says that if things were slim before these
financial hits will certainly render the project uneconomic (especially the
$2 to $3 million/year extra O&M). He did indicate that they are having very
good conversations with the DOE and would expect to sign a contract in April.
I am somewhat puzzled by what he could commit to since he would have no idea
what rates he could charge for the electricity or gas transportation.

I told Dennis we would follow-up with him shortly. In the meantime, we will
be working with Mark Baldwin to scope out the opportunities in New
Mexico.