Enron Mail

From:drew.fossum@enron.com
To:mary.miller@enron.com
Subject:Re: Red Rock posting
Cc:susan.scott@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com
Bcc:susan.scott@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com
Date:Tue, 27 Mar 2001 02:48:00 -0800 (PST)

I think we do say that in the "to the extent we didn't get binding bids for
all of the capacity" sentence. With that clarification, I think we ought to
get this posted and the letters out to shippers. Susan--make it so.
Thanks. df





From: Mary Kay Miller 03/26/2001 05:35 PM


To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Red Rock posting

As revised is ok, letter also, but shouldn't we refer to the fact we didn't
get binding bids, since we are way beyond March 2nd? MK





From: Drew Fossum 03/26/2001 01:39 PM


To: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Red Rock posting

Here are my comments--I'd like to take out the stuff about the rate and any
implication that we have flexible terms and conditions. DF





From: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 08:45 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Red Rock posting

Please see the attached and let me know your comments as soon as possible.