Enron Mail

From:drew.fossum@enron.com
To:susan.scott@enron.com
Subject:Re: Reply comments
Cc:mary.miller@enron.com
Bcc:mary.miller@enron.com
Date:Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:17:00 -0800 (PST)

Very artful--I think this resolves MKM's concern but I'll defer to her on=
=20
that. This approach does also give us more commercial flexibility which I=
=20
think the marketers should like. df


From: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/23/2001 10:04 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: =20

Subject: Reply comments

Mary Kay, here is my proposed "fix" for paragraph 1 b. ...running it by yo=
u=20
just to make sure I understood your message correctly. Let me know if this=
=20
is OK.

Calpine has also requested that the tariff be amended to clarify that=20
capacity remains generally available during the notice period but not durin=
g=20
the option bidding process. However, it was not Transwestern=01,s intent t=
o so=20
limit the availability of recourse service. Recourse shippers may request=
=20
and obtain posted capacity at any time, including during the option bidding=
=20
process, unless and until an option is sold on that capacity. If this is n=
ot=20
clear in Transwestern=01,s proposed tariff provisions, Transwestern will mo=
dify=20
the tariff sheets accordingly. =20