|
|
Enron Mail |
What would we have to do to get rid of the Demarc deal approval requirement
(requiring President level approval for all Demarc delivery deals)? Can Danny revoke the policy, just like Bill created it? DF ---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/25/2001 09:49 PM --------------------------- Drew Fossum 01/25/2001 08:00 AM To: Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Request 39833, EOL Deal As long as Dave and/or you are signing off on the EOL packages, I don't have any problem with this. As to non-EOL deals, we may also want to eliminate the requirement that all Demarc deals need such a high approval level. I don't think there is anything uniquely risky about Demarc as long as we have our capacity posting squared away. DF Danny McCarty 01/24/2001 12:26 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Request 39833, EOL Deal Drew, Placement of a demarc delivery package on EOL necessarily means it was approved. An after the fact note from Linda will suffice. Dan ---------------------- Forwarded by Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron on 01/24/2001 12:25 PM --------------------------- Linda Trevino 01/24/2001 08:48 AM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron cc: Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Request 39833, EOL Deal Tenaska Marketing Ventures accepted a package on EOL yesterday that delivers to demarc. Although EOL deals are pre-approved the CMS system is coded to route demarc deals to the president level. In order to expedite the activation of this request and since it was a pre-approved EOL deal, I approved the route for each of you in CMS per a request from marketing. Please let me know if this process will not be agreeable on future EOL deals that include demarc. Thanks Linda
|