|
|
Enron Mail |
Sounds OK to me. Thanks. DF
From: Susan Scott 04/03/2000 02:48 PM To: Drew Fossum@ENRON cc: Subject: SoCal motion FYI ---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 04/03/2000 02:47 PM --------------------------- From: Susan Scott 04/03/2000 02:48 PM To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, mbaldwin@igservice.com cc: Subject: SoCal motion See the attached. Enron Corp. has already authorized Brian Cherry to add Enron to the list of parties at the end of the document. I recommend TW do the same. I propose that we ask Brian to add TW to the list, with a footnote that we support the transmission proposal only and do not oppose the other parts of the term sheet. (I propose this out of an abundance of caution because in one part of the document Brian states the parties have agreed on comprehensive settlement, but later in the document he states that the parties aren't fully committed yet.) If he will not agree to do this, then I would suggest we leave TW off the list and file a letter with the CPUC along the lines of what I circulated yesterday, with additional language supporting the motion for extension of time. Let me know what you think.
|