Enron Mail

From:drew.fossum@enron.com
To:shelley.corman@enron.com
Subject:Re: Support for Tennessee's Hourly Firm Service
Cc:mary.miller@enron.com, maria.pavlou@enron.com, dave.neubauer@enron.com,robert.kilmer@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, ray.neppl@enron.com, jack.boatman@enron.com, frazier.king@enron.com, julia.white@enron.com
Bcc:mary.miller@enron.com, maria.pavlou@enron.com, dave.neubauer@enron.com,robert.kilmer@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, ray.neppl@enron.com, jack.boatman@enron.com, frazier.king@enron.com, julia.white@enron.com
Date:Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:58:00 -0800 (PST)

I don't have a problem supporting the concept generally. Since they took the
trouble to ask for our help, its probably the right thing to do politically
and relationship-wise. On the substance, I doubt this will do them or us
much good in the long run as FERC will just ignore us all if pipelines start
acting as cheerleaders for each others' proposals. Will they ghost write it
or do you need someone to draft it up? DF




Shelley Corman
01/18/2001 03:11 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Jack Boatman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Frazier
King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Support for Tennessee's Hourly Firm Service


Margarite Wong-Chapman, general counsel of Tennessee Gas Pipeline (and Peggy
Heeg, general counsel of El Paso corp) called me to see if the Enron Pipeline
would be willing to file in support of their hourly firm filing. She called
because she said that our pipelines are on record as saying that pipelines
need flexibility to serve electric generators. Protests are coming from the
Dynegy/Indicate Shipper crowd that claim that pipeline can provide hourly
flexibility within current FT. A technical conference is set for next
Tues. & either Nancy or Jan will cover.

I told Margarite that I would see whether I could drum up any support for an
ETS intervention and comments in support. I told her that any ETS comments
would at most be brief and state general support for the notion that pipeline
need flexibility to serve electric generators. I also told her that I
doubted that we could file by next Tues.

Let me know what you think. Personally I see some value from cooperating
with El Paso on this issue.

FYI - I will separately fax you a copy of the proposal to be discussed at the
next INGAA/Generator roundtable meeting next Tues. here in Houston. For the
most part, the proposal is more of the same tone -- we should be able to
serve generators under existing services.