Enron Mail

From:mary.miller@enron.com
To:shelley.corman@enron.com
Subject:Re: TW options filing
Cc:drew.fossum@enron.com, susan.scott@enron.com, glen.hass@enron.com,mary.darveaux@enron.com
Bcc:drew.fossum@enron.com, susan.scott@enron.com, glen.hass@enron.com,mary.darveaux@enron.com
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:18:00 -0800 (PST)

OOPs I forgot the date- you are correct- MK




Shelley Corman
11/13/2000 02:11 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW options filing

I thought that was the point of requesting a December 1 date -- so that the
Commission had a longer period to act. Since we requested an effective date
with more than 30 days advance notice (but less than 60 days per 154.207 of
the regs), then the Commission has until the effective date to act? ( NGA
717c.)





From: Mary Kay Miller 11/13/2000 12:16 PM


To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: TW options filing

At this mornings staff meeting, Stan asked about the status of TW options
filing, Shelley indicated that she felt it would be on the Nov 21 st
agenda. The 30 days to act is up on Nov. 16th, if the FERC hasn't done
anything aren't the tariff sheets approved as filed?? If that answer is yes,
isn't an order after that date required to meet the SS 5 requirements??
Just thinking about the timing- MK