Enron Mail

From:drew.fossum@enron.com
To:julie.armstrong@enron.com
Subject:Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: enron: host not found)
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 03:17:00 -0800 (PST)

Julie--pls forward to Danny. I've had trouble the last couple of days
getting emails to go through to him. Am I doing something wrong?
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/20/2000
11:13 AM ---------------------------


Mail Delivery Subsystem <Mailer-Daemon@postmaster.enron.com< on 12/20/2000
10:12:07 AM
To: <Drew.Fossum@enron.com<
cc:

Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: enron: host not found)


The original message was received at Wed, 20 Dec 2000 16:12:07 GMT
from [172.28.10.39]

----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<Danny.McCarty/ET&S@enron<

----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 <Danny.McCarty/ET&S@enron<... Host unknown (Name server: enron: host not
found)

----- Original message follows -----

Return-Path: <Drew.Fossum@enron.com<
Received: from nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.39])
by postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id QAA12391
for <Danny.McCarty/ET&S@enron<; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 16:12:07 GMT
From: Drew.Fossum@enron.com
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id
<Tac1c0a27509873f2cf@nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com< for
<Danny.McCarty/ET&S%Enron..@enron.com<;
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:12:03 -0600
Subject: Re: Gallup Mods
To: Stanley.Horton@enron.com
Cc: Danny.McCarty@Enron, Phil.Lowry@enron.com, Steven.Harris@enron.com,
Mary.Kay.Miller@enron.com, Keith.Petersen@enron.com
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:11:55 -0600
Message-ID: <OF4D4B354C.BCDE22DC-ON862569BB.0057418A@enron.com<
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.4 |June 8,
2000) at 12/20/2000
10:11:39 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Absolutely. I got a report yesterday on the 30-40 million/day that Phil
and his guys may be able to squeeze out of the system with debottlenecking
etc. We'll be ready to go to expedite any approvals that may be necessary
on that project. On the quick 10 million/day that we've been working on,
there's a potential alternative to building more Gallup horsepower that may
get us the 10 million much quicker and at a lower cost. Steve Harris and I
talked about it yesterday and I hope we can run it to ground in a day or
two. We will be ready to file at FERC shortly on the 15,000 hp at Gallup
if the alternative doesn't pan out. We'll look at combining the 30-40 mm/d
project with the Gallup compression for FERC filing purposes. DF




Stanley Horton
12/19/2000 06:15 PM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/ET&S@Enron ., Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Gallup Mods (Document link: Drew Fossum)

Lets make sure we are picking-up on the other ideas Phil has for getting
additional capacity on Tw. If any of his ideas require regulatory approval
we will probably want to include in the same certificate application.