Enron Mail

From:drew.fossum@enron.com
To:steven.harris@enron.com, mary.miller@enron.com, dave.neubauer@enron.com,julia.white@enron.com
Subject:TW
Cc:maria.pavlou@enron.com, susan.scott@enron.com, martha.benner@enron.com,shelley.corman@enron.com
Bcc:maria.pavlou@enron.com, susan.scott@enron.com, martha.benner@enron.com,shelley.corman@enron.com
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 03:10:00 -0800 (PST)

Lets talk about this on the 4th or 5th. I'll have Martha set up a meeting.=
=20
Note that this will catch the Sempra negotiated rate deals, but not our=20
January deals (yet). DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/27/2000=20
11:02 AM ---------------------------


Shelley Corman
12/27/2000 10:27 AM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew=
=20
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven=20
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven J=20
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject:=20

Attached is a copy of the data request that we received in the San Diego=20
proceeding.=20
Many other parties, including Kern, Mojave, Burlington etc received data=
=20
requests as well.





FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426

December 22, 2000
Mary Kay Miller
Vice President, Rates and Certificates
Transwestern Pipeline Company
1111 South 3rd Street
Omaha, ME 68124-1000

Re: San Diego Gas & Electric Company
Docket No. RP01-180-000

Dear Ms. Miller:

In order for the Commission staff to fully evaluate the
request for emergency relief, we require information in addition
to that which was submitted by San Diego Gas & Electric Company
in its petition and the intervenors in their comments and
protests. Pursuant to section 14(a) of the Natural Gas Act, 15
U.S.C. =0F5 717m(a)(1994), please respond to the attached data
requests no later than January 16, 2001. Response(s) should be
filed with the Secretary of the Commission and provided to all
intervening parties in the proceeding. In addition, please
provide a copy of the response(s) to James A. Pederson (Room 72-
27). =20

To the extent you believe privileged treatment is
appropriate, section 388.112 of the Commission's regulations sets
forth the procedures for requesting such treatment for some or
all of any information submitted to the Commission. The
Secretary of the Commission will place documents for which
privileged treatment is sought (in accordance with section
388.112) in a nonpublic file while the request for privileged
treatment, or any challenge to such request, is pending before
the Commission.

=20
Sincerely,=20


Daniel L. Larcamp, Director
Office of Markets, Tariffs and
Rates

cc: All Parties

Enclosure
=0F,






Enclosure
=20

1. For the months of November and December, 2000, provide the
following information for each contract for transportation
to the California border:

a. contract demand by shipper;
b. the daily scheduled volume by shipper;
c. the daily delivered volume by shipper;
d. whether the service is firm or interruptible;=20
e. the rate charged;
f. term of the contract; and=20
g. receipt and delivery points associated with the
contract.

2. For each transaction identified in Question 1, provide an
explanation for any difference between scheduled volumes and
delivered volumes.

3. Provide an explanation for any rate charged below the
maximum tariff rate.

4. For the months of November and December, 2000, provide the
following information for each capacity release transaction
for transportation to the California border:

a. the transaction or contract identification number, or
offer number;
b. the name of the releasing shipper;
c. the name of the acquiring shipper;
d. the contract quantity;
e. the term of the contract;
f. the acquiring shipper's contract rate;
g. the releasing shipper's contract rate; and=20
h. any special details pertaining to the contract.

5. For the months of November and December, 2000, provide the
daily flowing capacity and maximum pipeline design capacity
(based upon scheduled nominations), both for the system
generally, and to California.

6. Provide an explanation for each instance during November and
December, 2000, that the daily maximum available pipeline
capacity is below the peak day design capacity.

7. Provide an explanation for any daily variance during
November and December, 2000, in the maximum available
pipeline capacity.