|
|
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Moore, Jan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JMOORE3< X-To: Geaccone, Tracy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tgeacco< X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \TGEACCO (Non-Privileged)\Geaccone, Tracy\Inbox X-Origin: Geaccone-T X-FileName: TGEACCO (Non-Privileged).pst Here are the answers to questions 1, 2, & 4: 1. What percent of TW's volumes transported during the 3rd Qtr 2000 and 3rd Qtr 2001 was firm vs. interruptible? 2000 2001 July Aug Sept July Aug Sept IT Percentage .09 .09 .09 .10 .08 .07 Firm Percentage .91 .91 .91 .90 .92 .93 2. What percent of TW's pipe capacity was used during 3rd Qtr 2000 and 3rd Qtr 2001? 2000 2001 West flow information July Aug Sept July Aug Sept Percentage flow vs. capacity .90 .95 .97 100 100 .91 2000 2001 East flow information July Aug Sept July Aug Sept Percentage flow vs. capacity .81 .85 .86 100 100 .91 4. On James Weitekamp's "ETS Selected Financial and Operating Highlights" schedule, transport volumes are shown as being higher for 3rd Qtr 2001 as compared to 1st Qtr 2001. This doesn't really make sense considering 1st Qtr is a peak time and 3rd Qtr is not. Why does this difference exist? July and August are peak times for TW. However, during the 3rd quarter volumes flowing East to West decreased due to pricing. Volumes significantly increased from East to East because pricing was better, increasing total throughput for the 3rd quarter. -----Original Message----- From: Walton, Mark Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 10:16 AM To: Moore, Jan Subject: FW: Additional followup earnings release questions from Tony Jackson -----Original Message----- From: Dimacali, Aurora Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 9:34 AM To: Walton, Mark Cc: Fancler, Dan; Zahn, Gary; Tony Jackson (E-mail) Subject: Additional followup earnings release questions from Tony Jackson Mark: Can you please reply to the 4 questions per attached sheet. Tony Jackson needs the answers by noon today. Thanks. Aurora
|