|
|
Enron Mail |
You might want to send these to Kim
Some brief comments: 1.b) Term: Finance would greatly prefer a right to extend for a period of at least 10 years to be exercised at least 2 years prior to the expiration date. This would allow for time to find a replacement shipper before the expiration date. In no case should we agree to an annual evergreen as this is optionality without any cost to them. 2. Conduct of Open season/Contract Quantity Reduction: Need to establish an "Initial Recourse Rate" prior to the open season in order for their proposed mechanism to work. Without it there is no way to measure the "proportionate reduction" requested. We need to get Paul Cherry working on the credit of MGI Supply ASAP. -----Original Message----- From: Watson, Kimberly Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 6:49 PM To: Harris, Steven; Huber, Lee; Fossum, Drew; Hayslett, Rod; McCarty, Danny; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Martin, Jerry D. Subject: Trans Pecos For your information, attached is the redlined version of the LOI from Pemex. I have been discussing these comments with Dave Matney at Kinder Morgan. I have also discussed these comments with Pemex and they do intend on giving us feedback on the rate we offered within the next week. It is Pemex's intention to move forward with this LOI with an agreed upon rate (even though it currently says "To Be determined") prior to execution. I will keep you posted as we get more information. If you have any comments regarding any of these issues, please feel free to contact me, otherwise, please look forward to review our next draft prior to us sending it back to Pemex. Thanks, Kim (X33098) << File: TransPecosPEMEX comments 07-17-01.doc <<
|