Enron Mail

From:chris.germany@enron.com
To:judy.townsend@enron.com
Subject:Storage Demand Issue
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:51:00 -0800 (PST)

We know about this don't we Judith!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 06:51
PM ---------------------------


Brenda H Fletcher
01/12/2000 09:19 AM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Storage Demand Issue

FYI - You may already be aware of this but I'm passing this on in case you
didn't know this.

BF

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Coates/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 09:08
AM ---------------------------
From: Dave Nommensen on 01/10/2000 02:02 PM
To: Jeff Coates/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Storage Demand Issue

Storage deals require a meter on both the injection side and the withdrawal
side in order to bridge - even if there is only a demand charge.
A zone is not enough, it must have a meter. Let me know if that works.

d.n.



Enron North America Corp.

From: Jeff Coates 01/10/2000 01:52 PM


To: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Storage Demand Issue

The deal was entered on friday 1/7, and your right it never bridged over to
Unify. I don't understand the location question,
the deal was set up like all other storage tickets. I'm just trying to get
the demand to download so VM can draft it.