Enron Mail

From:steve.jackson@enron.com
To:chris.germany@enron.com
Subject:CES Retail Index Positions
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 28 Apr 2000 01:48:00 -0700 (PDT)

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000 08:47
AM ---------------------------



From: Colleen Sullivan 04/28/2000 08:41 AM


To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Retail Index Positions

Scott--
Here is your problem in getting these booked. You can do what you want, but
I still think we should book it. The flexibility in takes is only 10% so
your flash to actual will not be that great--certainly less than if you don't
book anything. Plus, at least if we book something it will be easier to tell
if they do not take the volumes they are supposed to. In addition, per our
discussion with Retail--which Dick was in on that meeting--it is unlikely
that the sale of the CES-Retail business would occur before September or
October, which in my mind means it may not be til the end of the year. This
would pretty much get us to the end of the deal term. And finally, what if
Chris and/or Dick is gone at some point in time--we need the volume info in
there.

Obviously it is just my recommendation to book it---you can do what you
want.


---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------



From: Steve Jackson 04/27/2000 04:03 PM


To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES Retail Index Positions

FYI,

I talked to Chris and Dick about the issue that the CES index positions are
not reflected in the books. Chris was concerned about what (firm) volume to
book since there is flexibility in the takes. Also, he said he has a strong
feeling that CES-Retail may go away in the near future so why book it. Dick
agreed that maybe we should not book anything on this right now. So Chris
said he will look into this issue early next week and get with me.