|
|
Enron Mail |
Chris,
Still trying to get Ashland straight. Thanks for the information yesterday. Enron, Ashland are TCO are all of the same accord, in that all are saying that the gas came from Enron and not CES. The problem is that CES has paid Enron for this same 1022 per day for those three months. This is what we have confirmed with TCO as well...that CES did not make these volumes available to Ashland, either. We are showing that Enron invoiced and that CES paid $79,125.80 for 31,662 dths for these volumes in January, $87,442.34 for 31,682 in February (s/b 29,638 dth but we were invoiced and paid for 31,662) and March was $86,491.86 for 31,682 again. This makes for a total refund due CES of $253,059.99 for these volumes. This could be paid along with the storage imbalance sale to Enron for $183,339.00 for a total of these two transactions of $436,398.99. Thanks for your attention to this. Call me if you have questions. Don Kirkendall Chris.Germany@enron.com on 10/09/2000 09:35:50 AM Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com To: Donald Kirkendall/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS cc: Subject: Re: Ashland Chemical Yes I wuz! dkirken@columbiaenergygroup.com on 10/09/2000 07:47:58 AM To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com< cc: Subject: Re: Ashland Chemical Were you REALLY working Saturday night at 11:30??? Chris.Germany@enron.com on 10/07/2000 11:31:59 PM Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com To: Donald Kirkendall/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS cc: Subject: Re: Ashland Chemical Hey Don, I'm still working on this. I should have an idea by this Wed.
|