Enron Mail

From:darron.giron@enron.com
To:dgiron1@pdq.net
Subject:NSS Narrative
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:07:00 -0700 (PDT)

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000
06:07 PM ---------------------------



From: Kevin P Radous @ ENRON 06/26/2000 11:13 AM


To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NSS Narrative

Darron,

I am forwarding to you some info on the NSS transaction. I don't know if you
are interested or not but here it is.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron on 06/26/2000
11:11 AM ---------------------------



From: Kevin P Radous 06/22/2000 09:49 AM


To: t.allen@pecorp.com
cc:
Subject: NSS Narrative

Tim,

The document attached directly below this verbage is what I included to our
risk folks as we discovered
that the way we were booking NSS was not correct. Below this attachment is
our risk director's independent
solution to the problem; you will note that it is the same conclusion that we
(Richard and myself) came up with
(see the e-mail I sent at the very bottom of this e-mail).

Hopefully this will help.

Kevin




---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000
09:06 AM ---------------------------
To: Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Proposed Change to correct the flaws regarding the NSS program

Kevin, your not going to believe me but as soon as I got your revised E-Mail,
I had the answer for you.









From: Kevin P Radous @ ENRON 06/12/2000 06:35 PM


To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Tomaski/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee Fascetti/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Proposed Change to correct the flaws regarding the NSS program

Richard, Lee, and myself met this afternoon and reviewed the memo I prepared
intending to find and propose a solution
to our existing valuation problem. We think we have the answer. We would
appreciate any comments from our risk experts.

The following change to our existing deal is what we think will solve the
problem. All that we are doing is changing the fixed
price on Legs 2 and 3 to 0. If you refer to the example mentioned in my
earlier memo, you will note that the p/l attributable to
this deals should be 52,777; by changing these legs to 0 we accomplish this
end result.



I look forward to any feedback any of you may have to offer.