|
|
Enron Mail |
Is it really necessary to change the book names just to avoid confusion? Who
is confused? Can't we just inform those who need to know that the Denver books are simply another desk that rolls up into the West Region? I don't want to be difficult, but it will require a great deal of time and effort to change every deal in the Denver books to a new name. Let me know what you think. DG 3-9573 From: Shona Wilson @ ENRON 03/30/2001 11:55 AM To: Burton McIntyre/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Denver FT and IM books Is this possible to do easily? ---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 03/30/2001 10:54 AM --------------------------- From: Mark Whitt on 03/30/2001 10:53 AM Sent by: Mark Whitt To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tyrell Harrison/NA/Enron@Enron, Theresa Staab/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nicole Cortez/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Denver FT and IM books As part of the Doorstep project, (internal audit) it has become apparrent that we should rename the Denver trading books in order to avoid confusion in regards to who manages the risk in those books. Since we have completed the transfer of those books to Houston and Jay is now managing those books I think it is appropriate to remove Denver from the title so people outside of the West Group don't think we are trading in Denver. Of course we will continue to support Jay in whatever he needs and provide the middle market and origination coverage to the customers associated with the deals in this book. Let me know if anyone has any concerns regarding this and Shona Wilson can make the name changes if we let her know what name to change it to. Mark
|