|
|
Enron Mail |
Do you know what this is about? Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 11:17 AM ----- George McClellan 04/11/2000 02:45 PM To: Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Force Majeur Claim - Fiddlers Ferry Unit 2 Rogue cargo? What the hell! Stuart Staley 04/11/2000 09:43 AM To: Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Force Majeur Claim - Fiddlers Ferry Unit 2 Robert - is this legit? George - the beat goes on ---------------------- Forwarded by Stuart Staley/LON/ECT on 11/04/2000 15:38 --------------------------- Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: MCrosland@edisonmission.com 11/04/2000 14:53 To: Stuart.Staley@enron.com cc: Peter.Bradley@enron.com, "LondonFuels" <LondonFuels@edisonmission.com< Subject: Force Majeur Claim - Fiddlers Ferry Unit 2 Stu, I am sure you will be aware from your market intelligence of the problems at FF Unit 2, which we are advised is an event of Force Majeur. I believe it would be counter-productive to the spirit of current negotiations to prosecute an FM claim and do not therefore propose to do so at this time. However, in the event of an unsatisfactory outcome to these negotiations we do reserve the right to ultimately pursue a Force Majeur claim in respect of the failure of FF Unit 2. I am also holding back FF's claim for mill damage from the rogue cargo of hard La Loma coal on the same principle. Please respond if you disagree with this approach. Regards Max
|