Enron Mail

From:mark.haedicke@enron.com
To:andrew.edison@enron.com
Subject:Re: Letter to Timothy D. Bourn.DOC
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 6 Jun 2001 04:31:00 -0700 (PDT)

We need to address both issues unless there is some compelling reason not
to. Mark



Andrew Edison@ENRON
06/06/2001 09:19 AM

To: Joseph Deffner/Enron@EnronXGate, W David Duran/Enron@EnronXGate, Charles
Ward/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Alford/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Letter to Timothy D. Bourn.DOC

Attached is a draft arbitration demand our outside counsel has prepared on
the confidentiality issue only. For what it is worth, outside counsel does
have some concerns with just arbitrating the confidentiality issue. First,
they raise the possibility that by only raising the confidentiality issue, we
might be waiving the guaranty assignability issue. To try to prevent this
argument, you will note that we have put preservation language in the
arbitration statement of claim. We will need to do some additional legal
research to make sure that would do the trick. Second, outside counsel tends
to think the two claims together (confidentiality and the guarantee
assignability) work better together. Let's talk soon.


- Letter to Timothy D. Bourn.DOC