Enron Mail |
Alan, I like your suggestions. Please forward your e-mail to the rest of the
ogc to facilitate discussion. I would like to finalize this policy next week. Mark Alan Aronowitz 10/26/2000 01:42 PM To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: OGC/AGC Approval Policy for More Than One Year Contracts Mark: Got your voice mail on this. I wasn't sure if you were suggesting the policy for trading contracts or all contracts of greater than a year. My thoughts are as follows: 1) Policy Scope: I think we need to address whether the Policy will extend to trading as well as origination transactions. As you know, often there is a very blurry line. 2) Existing Masters: If a master is in place, confirmations will be used for terms of one month to greater than one year. I don't think it will be practical for us to approve these confirmations before signature unless there are material modifications done to the pre-approved confirmation template in the master, which would require Legal approval in the present state of affairs. I assume the Policy would only apply to individually negotiated contracts outside a Master Agreement. 3) Order of Magnitude: We should consider having a dollar figure (determined simply by multiplying the notional or contract volume x the contract price or the Enron financial commitment amount), coupled with the one year or greater term, that would require the additional OGC/AGC approval in order to make sure the requirement is imposed only for higher dollar contracts. I would be happy to discuss this with you further. Alan
|