|
|
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Watson, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KWATSON< X-To: Harris, Steven </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sharris1< X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \SHARRIS1 (Non-Privileged)\Harris, Steven\Deleted Items X-Origin: Harris-S X-FileName: SHARRIS1 (Non-Privileged).pst Steve, FYI, Kirk did not have good news on the approval for Big Sandy yesterday, but it looks like they have Plan B moving forward. I will stay in touch with Kirk and keep you posted. Thanks, Kim. -----Original Message----- From: Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources) [mailto:KetcheKL@bp.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:44 AM To: Watson, Kimberly Subject: RE: Big Sandy Delivery Point Construction and Operating Agreement - Revised Hi Kim. I trust that you are hanging in there with all of the recent activity. As for Big Sandy, the project was denied a "permit" yesterday by the ACC commissioners, driven principally by water issues. As for next steps, Caithness plans to submit a new filing for the same project, getting their "ducks in a row" on the water issues, and perhaps even conceding to the potential of dry cooling versus wet cooling. They expect to file this within the next 60 days. Thus, with a little luck, we will be back in the game on this project with an induced delay. I will keep you posted along the way....please do the same for me regarding any offerings/news/etc from your side. Thanks for all of your help so far on the project. Best regards. Kirk -----Original Message----- From: Watson, Kimberly [mailto:Kimberly.Watson@ENRON.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:36 AM To: Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources) Subject: RE: Big Sandy Delivery Point Construction and Operating Agreement - Revised Hi Kirk, I just wanted to check on you and see how the approval process was going. Have you heard from the ACC Commissioners yet? Please let me know if we can do anything for you. Thanks, Kim. -----Original Message----- From: Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources) [mailto:KetcheKL@bp.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:30 PM To: Watson, Kimberly Subject: RE: Big Sandy Delivery Point Construction and Operating Agreement - Revised Hi Kim. Just wanted to let you know that the Big Sandy project is awaiting a vote yes/no from the ACC Commissioners on the 26th of this month. At this point, I think it is likely that the project will not be approved, and may opt to resubmit. Counsel for Caithness in the appeal process suggested a negative bias in the ACC Power Plant Siting Committee, and that was not well received by the Commissioners....major blunder. I will keep you updated as this continues to develop. If a yes vote, then we will proceed immediately with interconnect agreement, etc. Best regards, Kirk ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************
|