Enron Mail

From:bill.rapp@enron.com
To:keith.petersen@enron.com
Subject:RE: Transwestern Red Rock Expansion
Cc:steven.harris@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com,lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, kay.miller@enron.com, robert.kilmer@enron.com, teb.lokey@enron.com, stephen.veatch@enron.com, donna.martens@enron.com, j..porter@enron.com, tony.pryor@enron.com, dari.do
Bcc:steven.harris@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com,lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, kay.miller@enron.com, robert.kilmer@enron.com, teb.lokey@enron.com, stephen.veatch@enron.com, donna.martens@enron.com, j..porter@enron.com, tony.pryor@enron.com, dari.do
Date:Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:27:16 -0800 (PST)

Keith,

=09If I understand your change to the second paragraph correctly, the new c=
ompressors at Stations 1, 2 and 3 will be completed and placed into service=
within the one-year deadline in the FERC order. The removal of the existin=
g units at those stations, however, will not be completed until six months =
after that. My general feeling is that as long as the old units are taken o=
ut of service by the one-year deadline and are no longer operational, we sh=
ould be ok and don't need to ask FERC for an extension. The ordering paragr=
aph from the FERC order requires that the new facilities be placed in servi=
ce within one year from the date of the order. It does not impose a similar=
deadline for the abandonment of the existing facilities. I take it that we=
would not operate the old and the new facilities at the same time (i.e., c=
ontinue to operate the existing compressors after we've installed and place=
d into operation the new compressors), since this would result in TW operat=
ing compression in excess of its certificated capacity. As long as we don't=
do that, I don't think there's any need to ask for a separate extension fo=
r the abandonment.=20

=09
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Petersen, Keith =20
Sent:=09Monday, November 19, 2001 11:05 AM
To:=09Rapp, Bill
Cc:=09Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Miller, Mary Ka=
y; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Veatch, Stephen; Martens, Donna; Peterse=
n, Keith; Porter, Gregory J.; Pryor, Tony; Dornan, Dari
Subject:=09FW: Transwestern Red Rock Expansion

Note the suggested changes. =20

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Rapp, Bill =20
Sent:=09Friday, November 16, 2001 2:45 PM
To:=09Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Miller, Mary Ka=
y; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Veatch, Stephen; Martens, Donna; Peterse=
n, Keith
Cc:=09Porter, Gregory J.; Pryor, Tony; Dornan, Dari
Subject:=09Transwestern Red Rock Expansion

=09Attached for your review and comments is a draft of a request to FERC to=
extend the period allowed under the Red Rock certificate for the abandonme=
nt and replacement of the compressors at Station 4. My understanding is tha=
t we need to request a one year extension as to Station 4 (but not as to th=
e other three compressor stations included in the Red Rock expansion) due t=
o the fact that we haven't fully contracted for all of the capacity authori=
zed by FERC. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks.


<< File: TWFERCExtension.doc <<