|
|
Enron Mail |
No, The canadian contract is only for canadian business. I do not recall the
assignment when El Paso and the Canadian group split, however, I do no want to allow the canadian agreement to be used for U S business. Bridgette Anderson@ENRON 02/21/2001 03:58 PM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. - Question#2 No, maybe I am missing something. Unless I am reading this incorrectly El Paso Merchant Energy Canada Inc. assigned all assests and contracts to El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. effective 12/31/00, therefore assigning K#96054452 (10/1/00). My line of thinking is that we will still have two masters for El Paso. Also, since the master was written to cover Canadian business wouldn't it make this K a little broader for all transactions? Dan J Hyvl@ECT 02/21/2001 03:39 PM To: Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. - Question#2 No, They are with two separate entities which each need to stay in place. Am I missing something? Bridgette Anderson@ENRON 02/21/2001 03:17 PM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. - Question#2 So, would you advise terminating the 10/1/00 agreement effective 3/1/01? If the answer is yes, would we need to send out an letter advising of our actions? Dan J Hyvl@ECT 02/21/2001 03:08 PM To: Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. - Question#2 Bridgette, I would stay with the April 1, 1998 agreement. The 10/01/00 agreement was with the canadian el paso entity. Bridgette Anderson@ENRON 02/21/2001 02:50 PM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. - Question#2 Dan, I have yet another El Paso question. We currently have two masters with El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.. As you are probably aware, they have gone through several name changes. We need to know which master to keep especially for EOL purposes. Please advise.
|