Re: New Deals

Ellen,
One more thing, when the deal is confirmed, it should be confirmed as an
Houston Pipe Line Company deal. If you have any questions please call me,
Barbara Gray or Jeff Hodge.

Ellen Wallumrod@ENRON
12/12/2000 10:42 AM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: New Deals

Dan & Janet,

Is this a confirmation of a deal or just an offer ?
Have you got a deal number ?
Our systems can not generate a confirmation without a deal number, so if this
is just an offer, can we just send out Janet's attached document ?

Regards
Ellen

Dan J Hyvl@ECT
12/12/2000 10:31 AM
To: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: New Deals

Ellen,
With this added information, can you generate the contemplated confirmation?
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 10:29 AM -----

Janet H Wallis
12/12/2000 09:57 AM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: New Deals

Forget the greenhouse requirements and just make it requirements up to 50
MMbtu a day. The meter number is #1598.
Also, the GTC method is fine with me.

Thanks,
J

Dan J Hyvl
12/12/2000 09:44 AM
To: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: New Deals

Janet,
Two items regarding the Panther deal. What is meant by "Greenhouse
requirements"? New delivery point, can be get a better description about
this point, is it currently in existence, if so, how was it put in, who was
the deal maker for the installation, etc. After this information is
provided, I see no reason why this shouldn't be documented by the confirm
desk using a standard GTC confirm.

Janet H Wallis
12/12/2000 09:17 AM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Deals

Panther

I will send the Entex deal later, thanks.

Janet