Enron Mail

From:michael.legler@enron.com
To:dan.hyvl@enron.com
Subject:Re: Westport
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 21 Dec 1999 01:41:00 -0800 (PST)

Dan,

We may change the wire transfer to a check.......I am trying to find out why
they don't want to use the wire transfer option.
On section 5, I do not want to add the proposed sentences.
Section 8, I am explaining to WestPort that this would only be done fo good
and reasonable cause.
Section 9, Do we have a problem making the assignment language bi lateral??
Section 11, I am trying to find out why they want to add the sentence.

Mike




Enron North America Corp.

From: Dan J Hyvl @ ECT 12/21/99 07:28 AM


To: Michael J Legler/HOU/ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Westport

Mike,
Are we sticking with wire transfer as the method for payment? I assume that
we are.
Section 5 Pressures - Is there any need to include the two sentences they
proposed at the end of that section? I assume there is not.
I see no need to make any of the changes proposed in Sections 8, 9 & 11.
Do you agree?
Assuming you are okay with the above I have attached a revised contract both
red-line and clean for your review.




Michael J Legler@ENRON
12/20/99 02:49 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Westport

Dan,

The breakout of $0.20 for field gathering, $0.15 for compression plus actual
fuel and shrink, and $0.15 for Ft. Union gathering works for me.

The last line of Section 2.1 is a problem. We cannnot guarantee a Feb 15.
date. I would like to put that we will endeavor to install the facilities as
quickly as conditions allow after the required permits are received by Enron
.
Section 4.2 - I don't agree with 90 days......I would settle on 45 days.

In the General Terms and Conditions definitions we need to leave dehydrator
fuel and dehydrating terms in under Equivalent Quantities and Gathering.
Under Quality the 6% by volume of total inerts must stay.

Let me know what you have a problem with.

Thanks,
Mike




Enron North America Corp.

From: Dan J Hyvl @ ECT 12/20/99 12:25 PM


To: Michael J Legler/HOU/ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Westport

Yes, Let me know if you agree with their breakout of the fee components.
20/15/15. If so I will change the agreement back and incorporate their other
changes for comment.



Michael J Legler@ENRON
12/20/99 11:17 AM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Westport

Dan,

Westport will go along with breaking up the service into field gathering,
gathering and compression.
Let me know where to go from here.
Is this just a matter of changing everything back the way it was with the
exception of the Gathering Fee section and responding to their other changes?

Mike
303-575-6488