Enron Mail

From:ruth.concannon@enron.com
To:mrosenberg@sithe.com, joliver@sithe.com
Subject:Sithe / Independence MW Turndown for Off-Peak & On-Peak Periods
Cc:jeff.donahue@enron.com, todd.busby@enron.com, dan.hyvl@enron.com
Bcc:jeff.donahue@enron.com, todd.busby@enron.com, dan.hyvl@enron.com
Date:Fri, 6 Oct 2000 02:21:00 -0700 (PDT)

Attached are draft documents that address entering into separate transactions
for
the off-peak and on-peak periods. As you can see, these documents are
similar to
the draft round-the-clock MW Turndown transactions that we have been
discussing.
We are proposing to paper these transactions as if the off-peak each month is
executed
first and then at a later date the on-peak transactions are executed when the
gas and
power prices allow us both to make money. We have also included language in
the
transaction agreements to allow negative values in the keep whole and revenue
sharing
formulas to be carried forward to the end of each quarter and included as a
true-up in
the last payment of each quarter. Below is a brief description of the other
changes:

Off-Peak Transaction:

Different physical plant burns for weekdays or weekends & holidays
Baseload resale of gas back to ENA
ENA's balancing capabilities in Canada will level out varying plant burns
ENA's balancing charges, if any, are included in the keep whole formula
No obligation to sell incremental gas supply into Empire ( i.e. No Part II )
Hourly average of the off-peak LBMP's is used in pricing formula

On-Peak Transaction:

On-peak LBMP's is used in pricing formulas
ENA obligation to sell incremental gas supply into Empire under Part II


Plase call me with your comments,

Ruth