Enron Mail

From:dan.hyvl@enron.com
To:barbara.gray@enron.com
Subject:Calpine Cogeneration Facility(s) relations
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:17:00 -0800 (PST)

Texas City Facility -
The relationship between HPL and Calpine has become and continues to be
strained. Calpine purchased the Texas City Cogeneration Facility from Enron
and Dominion Resources in early 1998. Prior to that time ENA supplied 45,000
MMBtu of gas under a fixed price contract and a Market Price agreement was in
place to provide any additional volumes that might be needed in addition to
that which Union Carbide Corporation had the contractual right to supply
under the historic arrangement, since they were the steam host for the
facility. After Calpine took over, these contracts either expired or were
terminated. At this point HPL became the sole supplier to the facility
although the interconnection with the Union Carbide delivery point with the
Calpine facility remained active and a new Transaction Agreement was put in
place whereby Calpine agreed to certain minimum and maximum quantity
obligations and agreed on the prices that would be paid for any short fall in
volumes. Since then, measurement disputes have been alleged and Calpine has
shortpaid HPL's invoices even after verbally agreeing that the amounts
invoiced were correct. Additionally, as a result of Calpine's power
purchaser's last minute notification to Calpine of reductions in the purchase
of power for the next day, which notification is usually after Calpine's next
day notification deadline to HPL, Calpine has resorted to the use of
creative force majeure situations in an effort to reduce their costs. These
notifications have occurred some thirteen (I think) times and Calpine has
provided little explanation to HPL of the nature of these events of force
majeure. When pressed for a more detailed explanation, they merely state
that they had to take down various unit(s) to repair or replace leaking
valves, etc.

Clear Lake Facility -
The relationship between Calpine and HPL is not as strained with regard to
deliveries at this facility. This may be because the contract covering the
base volume of gas being delivered by HPL has not changed since it was
negotiated by ENA in 1995. Midcon remains connected to the facility and
delivers certain quantities of market priced gas. Market priced gas is
required by the facility when its requirements exceed the base volumes
supplied under the 1995 agreement. Should the power purchase agreement be
amended to allow Calpine not to deliver powered or should the power purchaser
cancel the power purchase agreement, Calpine has negotiated an amendment
allowing for the delivery of the base volumes at alternative delivery
points. Currently, HPL has advised Calpine of an upcoming event of force
majeure which will require a cessation of deliveries of gas to the facility
which certain regulatory mandated tests are being performed on the A-S
pipeline. It is not known whether the Midcon delivery point has the capacity
to handle the entire facility gas requirements or not.