Enron Mail

From:tana.jones@enron.com
To:brent.hendry@enron.com, sara.shackleton@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com,susan.bailey@enron.com, mary.cook@enron.com, stephanie.panus@enron.com, frank.sayre@enron.com, cheryl.nelson@enron.com, francisco.leite@enron.com
Subject:Counterparty Name Conventions
Cc:jeffrey.hodge@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, alan.aronowitz@enron.com
Bcc:jeffrey.hodge@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, alan.aronowitz@enron.com
Date:Thu, 7 Jun 2001 01:16:00 -0700 (PDT)

A little forward movement trying to get the Global Counterparty not to set up
counterparties under division or trade names. If the counterparties insist
on doing so, we have been trying to get them to add the legal name as part of
the counterparty's name in GCP. For non-swap team members, you may want to
forward this email on to your groups as well.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 08:11 AM -----

Marilyn Colbert/ENRON@enronXgate
06/06/2001 05:47 PM

To: Sam Kemp/Enron@EUEnronXgate, Dianne Seib/ENRON@enronXgate, Matilda
Machado/ENRON@enronXgate, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S
Bryan/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa
Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian Hunter lindsay/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bernice Rodriguez/ENRON@enronXgate, Thu Pham Arnold/ENRON@enronXgate,
Kathryn Pallant/ENRON@enronXgate, Tandra Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill D
Hare/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Counterparty Name Conventions


In accordance with the suggestions provided by Mary Cook in our Legal Dept.,
we have come to an agreement in regard to the naming conventions for
divisions and trade names. For both divisions and dba/trade names, the
counterparty name will be formatted to lead with the sub-entity name,
followed by the parent legal name.

i.e. division name, division of parent legal name or trade name, a dba of
parent legal name

Ex. Duke Power, a division of Duke Energy Corporation

This layout will make it easier to choose the correct counterparty name and
avoid the misconception of duplicate records. Also the legal requirements
will be met.

Please notify me by Friday, June 8th, if there are any issues with this
format. Otherwise, the GCP group will commence using this proposed layout on
current and future requests.

Cleanup of existing records in GCP and Contracts will be accessed. In cases
where the requested name could exceed the 90 character length maximum there
will need to be an evaluation.

If there are any questions, please contact me @ 3-6517.

Thank you,
Marilyn