Enron Mail

From:leslie.hansen@enron.com
To:tana.jones@enron.com
Subject:Re: BP and WAPA ETA
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 02:51:00 -0800 (PST)

Tana:

Please go ahead and finalize the attached BP ETA letter agreement for=20
execution.

Thanks,

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 10:51 AM -----

=09Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
=0912/06/2000 10:35 AM
=09=09
=09=09 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
=09=09 cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
=09=09 Subject: Re: BP and WAPA ETA

Yes it is OK to do so!

Thanks,

Leonardo Pacheco



Leslie Hansen@ECT
12/06/2000 10:19 AM
To: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: Re: BP and WAPA ETA =20

Leonardo:

Just wanted to confirm that is it okay to circulate the BP ETA letter=20
agreement for execution with the change set out below.



=09Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
=0912/04/2000 04:16 PM
=09=09
=09=09 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
=09=09 cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
=09=09 Subject: Re: BP and WAPA ETA

Using "by third parties" instead of "hackers" seems fine.

Thanks for your help!

Leonardo Pacheco



Leslie Hansen@ECT
12/04/2000 09:38 AM
To: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron=20

Subject: Re: BP and WAPA ETA =20

Good point. What do you think about the following revision?

Section 4(b)(ii) of the ETA is hereby amended by inserting the words =01&(o=
ther=20
than by third parties who have not obtained the Passwords directly or=20
indirectly from or through Counterparty or as a result of Counterparty's=20
negligence)=018 after the first occurrence of the word =01&person=018 and b=
y inserting=20
the words =01&, unless such access, entry or action taken or not taken aris=
es=20
from acts or omissions of Enron and its directors, officers, employees,=20
agents or contractors=018 at the end of such section.

Leslie



=09Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
=0912/01/2000 04:45 PM
=09=09
=09=09 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
=09=09 cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
=09=09 Subject: Re: BP and WAPA ETA

Leslie,

We reviewed BP's ETA Amendments and have only one comment:

On point 6, Section 4(b)(ii) "(other than by hackers who have not obtained=
=20
the Passwords from or through Counterparty)". Do you believe the word =20
"hackers" should be used here? What is the definition of a "hacker"?


As for the WAPA ETA we are currently discussing with Credit one of the=20
clauses. As soon as we have the final approval or comments I will send them=
=20
to you.

Thanks!

Leonardo Pacheco
ext. 39938




David Forster
11/30/2000 03:05 PM
To: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: Re: BP and WAPA ETA

Please review for issues.

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000=
=20
03:06 PM ---------------------------


Leslie Hansen@ECT
11/30/2000 11:46 AM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT=20

Subject: Re: BP and WAPA ETA =20

Dave:

The UK agreement was signed May 10, 2000.

Leslie



=09David Forster@ENRON
=0911/30/2000 11:43 AM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
=09=09 cc: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
=09=09 Subject: BP and WAPA ETA

Amita,

Based on Leslie's note, it looks like the US agreement has not yet been=20
signed. If in fact the UK agreement has also not yet been signed, please le=
t=20
me know - if one BP company has been playing us off against the other for=
=20
negotiations purposes, it significantly changes the complexion of what both=
=20
agreements will contain.

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000=
=20
11:43 AM ---------------------------


Leslie Hansen@ECT
11/30/2000 11:22 AM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: BP and WAPA ETA

Dave:

Attached please find the final form of ETA letter agreement as negotiated=
=20
with BP Exploration and Gas, Inc. As you probably recall, this is the one=
=20
that required several concessions from us based upon the agreement that was=
=20
negotiated with BP Gas Marketing Limited. The traders are very anxious to=
=20
get this CP on EOL, so please give me a call at your earliest opportunity=
=20
with any questions.

I was also following up on the status of the Western Area Power=20
Administration ETA that I sent you on 11/27. This CP is extremely anxious =
to=20
start trading on EOL. This one is a bit unique, so call me if you want ot=
=20
discuss.

As always, thanks.

Leslie