Enron Mail

From:justin.boyd@enron.com
To:tana.jones@enron.com
Subject:Re: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:11:00 -0700 (PDT)

thanks tana!

j

ps. i got hit by a polo ball on saturday!






Matthew Dawson
25/09/2000 17:04
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement

Hi tana

We have recently negotiated and signed an Isda with Barclays Bank ,(ECTRIC
being the Enron Entity) which included some additional clauses in the
Schedule( regarding Enron online trading) which Barclays want to include in
the already existing ISDA between ENA and Barclays. The details and The
suggested Amendment Agreement are included below. Please could you take a
look at this wording.The clauses are identical to those that we have argeed
in the latest Isda.

Good to speak to you this afternoon and I will let you know how Edmund is
doing.

Regards

Matt D
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT on 25/09/2000
16:21 ---------------------------


Justin Boyd
25/09/2000 15:53
To: Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement

matt

you will need to pass this by tana jones in the US for approval

j




Matthew Dawson
25/09/2000 15:03
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Barclays Guarantee and requested Amendment Agreement

Hi Justin,

Just to let you know the Guarantee arrived from Houston this morning. I have
sent it on to Leigh. Also she requested that we amend the other Existing ISDA
Master Agreement Barclays has with Enron North America, dated 13 Jan 1994 to
include the Part 5(h) and(o) wording dealing with Procedures for entering
into Transactions(Online and others), and also the Part 6 wording dealing
with Additional Provisions for Commodity Derivatives Transactions.

I attatch her proposed amendment agreement. The wording of the clauses is
identical to that which was agreed in the ECTRIC Master that has just been
signed, although the numbering of Part 5 (o) differs in the recent Isda with
ECTRIC. Barclays cannot trade with ENA until the Isda has been amended. Are
we able to accommodate the agreement?