Enron Mail

From:tana.jones@enron.com
To:frank.davis@enron.com, stephanie.sever@enron.com
Subject:Re: Counterparty Names-Cities and Counties
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 10 Aug 2000 06:52:00 -0700 (PDT)

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000 01:52 PM -----

Leslie Hansen
08/10/2000 12:08 PM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Counterparty Names-Cities and Counties

My response does not change -- City of Huntsville, AL is not approved to
trade US power.

LEslie



Tana Jones
08/10/2000 11:43 AM

To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Counterparty Names-Cities and Counties

In the future, if we have a city or a county come through, we need to
identify the state they are located in as part of the counterparty name. The
City of Huntsville is an example where I took it to be the the City of
Huntsville, TX, and, per my conversation with Tom today, it appears they are
the City of Huntsville, AL. This isn't going to be a problem with my
financial approval, since I shut down all cities for financial unless we have
a master in place, but it might be a problem for power. The same would apply
to counties.

So, if we get cities and counties in, let's try and make the state part of
the counterparty name.

Leslie, do you have any problem w/Huntsville, let me know?