|
|
Enron Mail |
Jake -
The Cargill changes are acceptable except for (1) the deletion of the non-solicitation provisions and (2) the change back to Minnesota law. The non-solicitation provision is a business call and relates to the disclosures being made and individuals involved in the project. If Cargill will have contact with key EOL IT personnel, the non-solicitation should be part of the agreement. As to the change of law, we cannot accept Minnesota and must have New York as this is a neutral forum. Mark Senior Counsel, EWS Phone: 713-345-8897 Facsimile: 713-646-3490 E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com Jake Staffel/ENRON@enronXgate 05/17/2001 01:44 PM To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: FW: NDA Mark, Here is the revised Cargill NDA -----Original Message----- From: Anne_Pedrero@cargill.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Anne+5FPedrero+40cargill+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 12:57 PM To: Staffel, Jake Cc: Richard_Mack@cargill.com Subject: NDA Attached is a revised NDA with just a few changes. Please let us know if this works for you. Thanks! Anne _________________________________________ Anne Pedrero Cargill eVentures 1500 Fashion Island Boulevard, Suite 209 San Mateo, CA 94404 (650)356-7064 anne_pedrero@cargill.com http://www.cargilleventures.com - ENRON CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT2.DOC
|