|
|
Enron Mail |
Steve -
I looked at the below language. I guess I still have some concerns about the concept. Why don't we go back to your original suggestion and delete the concept entirely. I am sure if either party believes strongly enough that a breach has occurred, it will pursue its available remedies. If this is acceptable, I will work off of the draft forwarded by Brenda and see if we can finalize a document for signature by Enron. Please let me know if this will work. Thanks. Mark Senior Counsel, ENA Phone: 713-345-8897 Facsimile: 713-646-3940 E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com Steve.Barry@sabre.com 04/05/2001 10:34 AM Please respond to Steve.Barry To: mark.greenberg@enron.com, Brenda Crabtree <brenda.crabtree@sabre.com< cc: Subject: RESIDUAL KNOWLEDGE PROVISION Mark, attached please find the proposed Residual Knowledge provision that we discussed. If acceptable, please advise and I'll incorporate into the last version of the NDA. Thanks, Steve -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This communication is intended solely for use by the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized interception of this communication violates the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Any use, dissemination or copying of this communication other than by the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original and all copies of this communication. - 1_Residual knowledge clause.doc
|