Enron Mail

From:vkaminski@aol.com
To:vkaminski@aol.com
Subject:Fwd: EPRM Article
Cc:vkamins@enron.com
Bcc:vkamins@enron.com
Date:Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:04:00 -0800 (PST)

Return-path: <VKaminski@aol.com<
From: VKaminski@aol.com
Full-name: VKaminski
Message-ID: <d3.d9d4461.2761c976@aol.com<
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:19:50 EST
Subject: Fwd: EPRM Article
To: vkamins@enron.com
CC: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_1e.e608831.2761c976_boundary"
X-Mailer: Unknown sub 171



Return-Path: <chris@lacima.co.uk<
Received: from rly-xa05.mx.aol.com (rly-xa05.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.74])
by air-xa01.mail.aol.com (v77.14) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Dec 2000 12:47:35 -0500
Received: from mail01b.rapidsite.net (mail01b.rapidsite.net
[207.158.192.229]) by rly-xa05.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Dec
2000 12:47:00 -0500
Received: from www.lacima.co.uk (209.41.1.121) by mail01b.rapidsite.net (RS
ver 1.0.58s) with SMTP id 0923182 for <VKaminski@aol.com<; Tue, 5 Dec 2000
12:46:46 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <000001c05ee3$91887440$fd8301ca@eu.entergy.com<
Reply-To: "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk<
From: "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk<
To: <VKaminski@aol.com<
References: <6c.2cfb0c2.26e92926@aol.com<
Subject: EPRM Article
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 04:16:05 +1100
Organization: Lacima Consultants
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0097_01C05F3B.405E3980"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Loop-Detect: 1

Hi Vince,

Hope things are fine with you. I'm sorry that I only ever write to you when
I'm after something, but could you look at this simulation article - the
next installment in the EPRM articles.

Many thanks and best regards.

Chris.



----- Original Message -----
From: <VKaminski@aol.com<
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com<; <Les@lacima.co.uk<; <chris@lacima.co.uk<;
<robin@risk.co.uk<
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:23 AM
Subject: Re: VaR Article


< Les,
<
< The revised version of the VaR article looks fine.
<
< Vince
<

- EPRM_04_sim_mr.zip