|
|
Enron Mail |
....see you there...
Steve -----Original Message----- From: Kaminski, Vince Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 5:28 PM To: Stock, Stephen Subject: Re: FW: Re: Valuation Steve, Around 6:00 p.m. Vince From: Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/23/2001 05:26 PM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FW: Re: Valuation Vince, I'm in all this week.....what time are you going for the bus tonight? regards Steve -----Original Message----- From: stevestock@pagenetips.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-stevestock+40pagenetips+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 4:42 PM To: Stock, Stephen Subject: fwd: Re: Valuation ------ From: Vince Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com< Subject:Re: Valuation Steve, Please, let me know when you come back. I have detected a tendency to implement different approaches to valuation in the past. To some extent, it reflects the absence of formal rules for sign-off on the valuation techniques which, in turn, reflects, the turf wars and the desire by the originators to control the outcomes. Vince stevestock@pagenetips.com on 01/19/2001 06:53:14 PM To: vince.j.kaminski@enron.com cc: Subject: Valuation Vince, I'd like an opportunity to talk to you about valuation. I'm hearing confusing messages about the way that the UK IT team and the UK traders get their Valuation code aparently signed off by Research, while here... You provide it for our guys to wrap up. We have now a situation where the UK team are using a home grown Valuation piece called DOVE, where results differ from those of the equivalent USA portcalc. I need to break through the pride barriers and the "not built here" syndrome, and try to do the right thing, but I don't beleive I can do that without you guidance. I'm scared that if we diverge too much we will never work globally on these systems. Steve ------------------------ Tel: 713-345-8980 Cell: 281-541-1862 Page: stevestock@pagenetips.com Steve ------------------------ Tel: 713-345-8980 Cell: 281-541-1862 Page: stevestock@pagenetips.com
|