Enron Mail

From:vince.kaminski@enron.com
To:vasant.shanbhogue@enron.com
Subject:Newsletter
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:37:00 -0700 (PDT)

Vasant,

Can you, please, review this Newsletter article.
I had to put something together rather quickly last night.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001=
=20
07:37 AM ---------------------------


VKaminski@aol.com on 04/01/2001 11:22:50 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc: VKaminski@aol.com=20
Subject: Newsletter


Complexity of modern financial markets never ceases toamaze me. Te links =
=20
between different financial instruments are sometimes verysubtle and it=20
takes =20
understanding of many different types of transactions toexplain the =20
interdependencies. Recently, I have been receiving E-mails fromdifferent =
=20
academics and practitioners asking for explanation of anomalydetected in =
=20
pricing of credit default swaps. One E-mail asked the followingquestion: =
=20
According to a Bank of America publication, your (Enron) default swapspread=
s =20
are consistently trading about 80 basis points wider than your assetswaps. =
=20
Any idea of what is going on here?=20

Icame up with an answer with the help of Bryan Seyfried from Enron =20
Credit.com,our unit in London trading credit protection tools. The answer =
=20
requiresexplaining first what are credit default swaps. In a plain-vanilla =
=20
credit default swapstructure, the buyer pays a premium for protection he or=
=20
she receives in case acredit event (default) takes place in the case of a =
=20
reference entity. In theevent of default by the reference entity, the selle=
r =20
of the protection isrequired to pay an amount equal to the difference=20
between =20
the initial price ofthe credit exposure and its recovery value. For example=
, =20
the protection may bepurchased for a bond issued by the reference entity. I=
n =20
the case of a default,the seller of protection pays the difference between =
=20
the face value of the bondand its current(post-default) market price. =20
Mispricing of credit default swaps often takes placefollowing an issuance b=
y =20
the reference entity of convertible bonds. Aconvertible bond can be looked=
=20
at =20
as a combination of a regular coupon bond anda long-term equity option. =20
Sometimes the equity option may be mispriced and beavailable at a lower=20
price =20
than the comparable equity options that can beobtained at the derivatives =
=20
markets. The hedge funds buy convertible bonds toacquire the option=20
component =20
but are not interested in taking the issuer=01,scredit. They seek to lay of=
f =20
credit risk by selling the asset swaps or bybuying protection through=20
default =20
swaps. This arbitrage leads in many cases,after a large convertible bonds =
=20
issue, to imbalance in the asset swaps marketsvs. default swaps markets. Th=
e =20
cost of credit protection goes up but this hasnothing to do with =20
deterioration of the issuer=01,s credit. =20
One may expect that this imbalance will be eliminated overtime and the=20
prices =20
of default and asset swaps will converge. Frictions andrigidities in the =
=20
capital markets may slow down this process.=20
Enron issues recently a$1.9 billion convertible bond that became a target o=
f =20
arbitrage activitiescarried out by the hedge funds. What is very interestin=
g =20
is that analysts wholook at one segment of the financial markets in=20
isolation =20
from other segmentsmay be unable to explain the dynamics of prices. =20
Globalization has arrived andit has more than one dimension.
- credit.doc