|
|
Enron Mail |
Steve,
I submitted my evaluation. General impression was rather negative: he seems to be a consultant type person who speaks about everything with confidence but is short on depth and technical details. He is personable, outspoken, organized - on the positive side. Also, the red flag is that he jumps from job to job: typical after 18-24 months when any organization can ascertain his usefulness. Vince From: Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 01:03 PM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Interview Hi Vince, what did you think of David Hsu? My thoughts. Overall a good guy. Personable. Intelligent. He could communicate reasonably well, but seemed to be capable of losing objectivity in favour of technical advancement. He didn't seem comfortable with taking a man-management role (at least he didn't want to be an 'administrator') He appeared to know a lot about risk. (In fact Jay Web called me to say he felt David was one of the better risk guys he had seen but also commented that he needed to be coupled with a project manager to be successfull). regards Steve
|