Enron Mail

From:vince.kaminski@enron.com
To:tanya.tamarchenko@enron.com, grant.masson@enron.com
Subject:Re: VaR
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 1 Jun 2000 04:01:00 -0700 (PDT)

Tanya, Grant,

Can you join?

Vince


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000
11:04 AM ---------------------------


John Arnold
06/01/2000 10:21 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: VaR

Let's meet at 4:00.



Vince J Kaminski
06/01/2000 09:19 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: VaR

John,

We have been working for the last few days on VaR related issues.
The focus is on Jim Schwieger's storage book as of 5/25 and 5/26
where we had some counterintuitive results. This book is a good
candidate for a systematic review of the VaR process.

It seems that the problem arises from forward - forward vols used by the VaR
system. You can see in the attached spreadsheet that the VaR, on a cumulative
basis,
jumps on Jan 04, when an abnormal FF vol hits a relatively large position.
This FF vol is also much different from the previous day number producing a
big
jump in VaR.
This row (Jan 04) is in magenta font in the attached spreadsheet. Please, look
at column D.

The abnormal FF vol may result from one of the two factors:

a. a bug in the code. We are working with the person in IT who wrote the
code to review it.

b. a poorly conditioned forward vol curve ( a kink or discontinuity in
the fwd vol curve will do it). One solution I can
propose, is to develop for
the traders a fwd-fwd vol generator allowing them to
review the fwd vol curve
before it is posted. If it produces a weird fwd-fwd vol,
it can be smoothed.

Can you meet at 4 p.m. to review our findings?


Vince