Enron Mail

From:christi.nicolay@enron.com
To:dave.mangskau@enron.com
Subject:Re: ECAR filing
Cc:charles.yeung@enron.com, greg.woulfe@enron.com, patrick.hanse@enron.com,bill.rust@enron.com, lloyd.will@enron.com, richard.ingersoll@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, clint
Bcc:charles.yeung@enron.com, greg.woulfe@enron.com, patrick.hanse@enron.com,bill.rust@enron.com, lloyd.will@enron.com, richard.ingersoll@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, clint
Date:Tue, 2 May 2000 08:02:00 -0700 (PDT)

I reviewed the ECAR filing. ECAR is requiring Enron to agree to use it as an
ECAR control area. I generally think it is a good filing and of importance
because it is one of the first times that any reliability requirement of a
region has been filed at FERC (ECAR asks FERC to balance commercial needs,
reliability, equity, legal and policy objectives). The compensation between
ECAR control areas is meant to discourage Cinergy-type stealing from the
grid. It is mandatory for ECAR and ECAR invites other regions to
participate.

Inadvertant interchange (II) will be calculated over one hour. The NERC
performance subcomm. will balance the II to establish long and short
parties. Based on a proportional allocation, the short party will pay the
long party its top incremental cost (highest purchase price or generation
price for power) + 10% penalty. A $15/MW offset is used as the price of
power repaid in kind to the interconnected system based on existing NERC
settlement procedures. Price information is confidential.

The ECAR dispute resolution procedure is applicable (binding ADR is
voluntary). Parties retain the right to go directly to FERC.

Lloyd -- Are you OK with the specifics?

I do not see any reason to protest this. EPSA wants to use the $15 offset to
show what may be reasonable for generator interconnects and I am discussing
it with EPSA. We should file a routine intervention (to obtain pleadings,
orders, etc.) Interventions are due Friday, May 5.

Anyone disagree?






Dave Mangskau@ENRON
04/20/2000 04:58 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: ECAR filing

Christi:
for your info if you plan to file in support of this ECAR action, as Enron's
rep to ECAR I discussed this internally and have been supportive of a final
product that includes sanctions. Enron is not a voting member nor were we
given an opportunity to make changes to the final document that went out for
ballot..........but it was similar to what was discussed in recent ECAR
meetings and was finalized after ECAR reps met with FERC staff to meet FERC
concerns.

In addition, several weeks ago I presented the ECAR concept to the MAPP
Executive Committee and after discussion MAPP passed a resolution of support
for what ECAR was trying to accomplish to improve reliability. In order to
make a payment sanction for inadvertent really work, it should be approved by
an entire interconnection. ECAR officials are expecting approval very
quickly so that sanctions are in place this summer to help support
reliability.

If Enron has changed its position, and we plan to oppose this action, lets
discuss the ramifications including putting at risk the expected Executive
Board action on May 1 to ratify CRC and OP & L recommendations to grant
conditional certification of our two control areas in
ECAR. thanx





From: Christi L Nicolay @ ECT 04/20/2000 11:17 AM


To: Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg
Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd
Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: ECAR filing

ECAR actually filed this at FERC already this week. I am getting a copy of
the filing. We will have an opportunity to respond to it at FERC.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------


"Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com< on 04/20/2000 10:14:08 AM
To: <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com<, <snovose@enron.com<
cc:
Subject: ECAR filing


** PRIVATE **

ECAR has filed a Section 205 request for Commission approval of an
"Inadvertent Settlement Tariff." The Tariff is intended to obligate each
Party to make payment and to entitle each Party to receive compensation for
Inadvertent Interchange from each other Party pursuant to ECAR's Inadvertent
Settlement Procedure. Parties to the settlement include Allegheny Power
(Monongahela Power Company, The Potomac Edison Company, and West Penn Power
Company), American Electric Power Co., Big Rivers Electric Corp., Cinergy
Corp., Consumers Energy Co., The Dayton Power and Light Co., The Detroit
Edison Co., Duquesne Light Co., East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc.,
FirstEnergy Corp., Hoosier Energy REC, Indianapolis Power and Light Co., LG&E
Energy Corp., Northern Indiana Public Service Co., Ohio Valley Electric
Corp., and Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Co.

I will let you know when this gets noticed.